Abstract

Detection of chemical cues of predators and food resources is a key for the behaviour of many species in aquatic ecosystems. We checked whether predator origin and diet, containing potential food and/or alarm signals, affect the behaviour of omnivorous prey partly sharing their diet with a top predator. We conducted y-maze experiments to study the responses of invasive omnivorous and cannibalistic amphipods (Dikerogammarus villosus and Pontogammarus robustoides) to chemical cues of fish predators, injured amphipods and chironomid larvae (common amphipod food). As the predators, we used the goby Babka gymnotrachelus (sympatric with the amphipods) and piranha Pygocentrus nattereri (allopatric to the amphipods). The fish were either starved or fed amphipods or chironomids. D. villosus preferred predators fed chironomids and conspecifics as well as crushed conspecifics and chironomids, but avoided both hungry predators. Thus, D. villosus may perceive the presence of a top predator as an indication of both food resource and predation risk. P. robustoides avoided predators fed both amphipods (particularly conspecifics) and their alarm substances. The responses of both species depended more on the predator diet than on its species, which is likely to facilitate the recognition of allopatric predators and survival in newly invaded areas.

Highlights

  • Predation is one of the strongest factors shaping the relations between animals from successive trophic levels

  • D. villosus spent significantly more time in the y-arm with the cues obtained from crushed chironomids or conspecifics, as well as from both predators fed these types of food (Fig. 2A, B, C)

  • P. robustoides significantly reduced time spent in the mixing zone in the presence of all signals released by fish except red piranha fed conspecifics (Fig. 3A, B, C)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predation is one of the strongest factors shaping the relations between animals from successive trophic levels. That is why a proper assessment of predation risk using all available signals indicating the presence of a predator, its condition and probability of attack, including feeding strategy (Bernot & Turner, 2001; Haddaway et al, 2014), size (Radloff & Du Toit, 2004), density (Pennuto & Keppler, 2008) and hunger level (Abjornsson et al, 1997) is crucial for prey individuals. Aquatic organisms often use chemical signals for communication (Bronmark & Hansson, 2000; Beermann et al, 2015) These include kairomones: substances released by living organisms, which are perceived by and benefiting individuals of another species (Bronmark & Hansson, 2000). Kairomones are commonly involved in prey-predator recognition systems (Baumgartner et al, 2003; Schoeppner & Relyea, 2009; Szokoli et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call