Abstract

Songbirds that follow a conspecific attraction strategy in the habitat selection process prefer to settle in habitat patches already occupied by other individuals. This largely affects the patterns of their spatio-temporal distribution and leads to clustered breeding. Although making informed settlement decisions is expected to be beneficial for individuals, such territory clusters may potentially provide additional fitness benefits (e.g., through the dilution effect) or costs (e.g., possibly facilitating nest localization if predators respond functionally to prey distribution). Thus, we hypothesized that the fitness consequences of following a conspecific attraction strategy may largely depend on the composition of the predator community. We developed an agent-based model in which we simulated the settling behavior of birds that use a conspecific attraction strategy and breed in a multi-predator landscape with predators that exhibited different foraging strategies. Moreover, we investigated whether Bayesian updating of prior settlement decisions according to the perceived predation risk may improve the fitness of birds that rely on conspecific cues. Our results provide evidence that the fitness consequences of conspecific attraction are predation-related. We found that in landscapes dominated by predators able to respond functionally to prey distribution, clustered breeding led to fitness costs. However, this cost could be reduced if birds performed Bayesian updating of prior settlement decisions and perceived nesting with too many neighbors as a threat. Our results did not support the hypothesis that in landscapes dominated by incidental predators, clustered breeding as a byproduct of conspecific attraction provides fitness benefits through the dilution effect. We suggest that this may be due to the spatial scale of songbirds’ aggregative behavior. In general, we provide evidence that when considering the fitness consequences of conspecific attraction for songbirds, one should expect a trade-off between the benefits of making informed decisions and the costs of clustering.

Highlights

  • Habitat selection is a decision-making process that leads to observed patterns of spatiotemporal distribution of individuals

  • Certain costs and benefits of using social information are directly related to the process of reducing individual uncertainty; the clustered distribution that emerges as a by-product of conspecific cues may be associated with several predation-related costs and benefits that might influence the fitness of individuals [7], [8]

  • We aimed to examine the following: (1) the fitness consequences of following a conspecific attraction strategy in landscapes dominated by different predator types and (2) whether Bayesian updating of prior settlement decisions may improve the fitness of birds that rely on conspecific cues

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Habitat selection is a decision-making process that leads to observed patterns of spatiotemporal distribution of individuals. Birds follow a conspecific attraction strategy and prefer to settle in patches already occupied by other individuals, which leads to locally aggregated distributions, especially for songbirds that usually do not maintain exceptionally large territories [2], [3], [8]. This strategy of making settlement decisions is most likely widespread among songbirds, the fitness consequences for individuals are largely unexplored [7]. Certain costs and benefits of using social information are directly related to the process of reducing individual uncertainty; the clustered distribution that emerges as a by-product of conspecific cues may be associated with several predation-related costs and benefits that might influence the fitness of individuals [7], [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call