Abstract

Predation by mammalian and avian predators is an important cause of mortality in grouse species during all life stages and has been linked to impaired reproductive performance. Some grouse species are important game birds, but many populations are red-listed at the national level. In consequence, predator control is often conducted as a grouse conservation measure, but remains a contentious issue, also because evidence of its effectiveness is lacking. Here, we review the evidence on predation as a limiting factor for grouse populations and perform a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of predator control to benefit grouse population parameters. We found support that grouse populations appear to be typically limited by their predators. Predator control was associated with an overall positive effect size on grouse population parameters (i.e. mean of 1.43 times the reference value, 95% CI of 1.22–1.68). We found positive effect sizes for most population parameters (reproductive success; adult abundance and survival), but not all (brood size, nest success). Our results suggest that predator control is likely to achieve short-term conservation benefits for grouse if well-designed and rigorously conducted. We suspect, however, that the majority of control programmes conducted for conservation do not meet this standard.

Highlights

  • BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research

  • For a quantitative analysis of the effects of predator control on grouse population parameters we selected all studies resulting from group 2 of our literature search that either conducted the removal of one or more potential predators or utilized such a setting, while simultaneously recording population parameters of grouse species using a type of experimentally paired design and reported quantitative results

  • To account in our analysis for the different types of data reported in the original studies, we grouped the data (i.e. n = 51 value pairs) into seven types of grouse population parameters, including four types of reproductive parameters: A) brood size, B) the ratio of juveniles to adult birds counted (‘JUV/ADL’), C) the proportion of female birds observed with chicks (‘%CHICK’) and D) measures of nest success (‘NEST’); and three measures of adult population parameters: E) proportional changes in adult counts, F) adult density or density indices and G) adult survival

Read more

Summary

Introduction

BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Predator control was associated with an overall positive effect size on grouse population parameters (i.e. mean of 1.43 times the reference value, 95% CI of 1.22–1.68).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call