Abstract

Predation risk and resource availability are two primary factors predicted by theory to drive the evolution of life histories. Yet, disentangling their roles in life-history evolution in the wild is challenging because (1) the two factors often co-vary across environments, and (2) environmental effects on phenotypes can mask patterns of genotypic evolution. Here, we use the model system of the post-Pleistocene radiation of Bahamas mosquitofish (Gambusia hubbsi) inhabiting blue holes to provide a strong test of the roles of predation and resources in life-history evolution, as the two factors do not co-vary in this system and we attempted to minimize environmental effects by raising eight populations under common laboratory conditions. We tested a priori predictions of predation- and resource-driven evolution in five life-history traits. We found that life-history evolution in Bahamas mosquitofish largely reflected complex interactions in the effects of predation and resource availability. High predation risk has driven the evolution of higher fecundity, smaller offspring size, more frequent reproduction, and slower growth rate—but this predation-driven divergence primarily occurred in environments with relatively high resource availability, and the effects of resources on life-history evolution was generally greater within environments having high predation risk. This implies that resource-driven selection on life histories overrides selection from predators when resources are particularly scarce. While several results matched a priori predictions, with the added nuance of interdependence among selective agents, some did not. For instance, only resource levels, not predation risk, explained evolutionary change in male age at maturity, with more rapid sexual maturation in higher-resource environments. We also found faster (not slower) juvenile growth rates within low-resource and low-predation environments, probably caused by selection in these high-competition scenarios favoring greater growth efficiency. Our approach, using common-garden experiments with a natural system of low- and high-predation populations that span a continuum of resource availability, provides a powerful way to deepen our understanding of life-history evolution. Overall, it appears that life-history evolution in this adaptive radiation has resulted from a complex interplay between predation and resources, underscoring the need for increased attention on more sophisticated interactions among selective agents in driving phenotypic diversification.

Highlights

  • Growth rates and reproductive traits, such as age at sexual maturity and offspring size and number, can have strong effects on fitness and yet vary notably among and within species (Partridge and Harvey, 1988; Stearns, 1992; Roff, 2002)

  • Female body size was unknown for F2 broods, female body size does not differ between predation regimes in the wild or in our common-garden experiment, and we found that female size did not influence offspring size in F1 broods

  • The effects of resource availability depended on the predation regime and generation: a positive association between resource availability and fecundity was evident in most cases except for F2 broods of low-predation females (Figure 1B; largely matching predictions)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Growth rates and reproductive traits, such as age at sexual maturity and offspring size and number, can have strong effects on fitness and yet vary notably among and within species (Partridge and Harvey, 1988; Stearns, 1992; Roff, 2002). Trade-offs imposed by time and energy are proposed to drive phenotypic variation among different environmental conditions and across the lifespan of organisms (Van Noordwijk and de Jong, 1986; Stearns, 1989; Roff, 1992; Charnov, 1993; Roff, 2002) This trade-off framework forms a key foundation for the modern view of life-history evolution, yet we still have much to learn about how specific agents of selection directly and indirectly contribute to shape variation in key lifehistory traits in the wild (e.g., Riesch et al, 2020). Informative, such associations are frequently difficult to interpret (due to covariation among ecological selective pressures) and a contemporary challenge is to isolate and disentangle the role of specific ecological agents in the evolution of life histories

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call