Abstract

Regulatory competition is often believed to be a hard fact of the post globalization era. Legal systems have to be economically attractive – and thus law makers must work to achieve this purpose. However, this – as simple and seductive as it is – is not sound. Indeed a quick analysis of the preconditions to regulatory competition will show that far from being a brutal reality, it is quite reduced, even in the context of the European Union.This article has two purposes. The first one is theoretical: what are the conditions required to enter into regulatory competition in the real life? This question will lead to a new view of regulatory competition’s problematics. For example, it will be made clear that the doing business approach is flaw from beginning to end. Indirectly this question will also lead to an inquiry into the interconnections that exist between legal system and the necessity to think about a new model (like coopetition). The second one is more practical. To what extent should law makers be focused on the attractivity of their own legal system? Clearly, they will have to pay attention to this dimension but their freedom in choosing a rule is wider that it seems under the regulatory competition’s approach. Frequently paying attention only to the internal efficiency of their system is sufficient.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.