Abstract

We report a simple and sensitive microextraction system for the preconcentration and determination of Cu (II) by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction is a modified solvent extraction method and its acceptor-to-donor phase ratio is greatly reduced compared with other methods. In the proposed approach, 1,5-diphenyl carbazide (DPC) was used as a copper ion selective complexing agent. Several variables such as the extraction and dispersive solvent type and volume, pH of sample solution, DPC concentration, extraction time, and ionic strength were studied and optimized for a quantitative preconcentration and determination of copper (II) and at the optimized conditions: 60 μL, 0.5 mL, and 5 mL of extraction solvent (chloroform), disperser solvent (ethanol), and sample volume, respectively, a linear calibration graph was obtained over the concentration range of 10–200 μg L−1for Cu (II) withR2= 0.9966. The limit of detection (3Sb/m), and preconcentration factor are 2 μg L−1and 25, respectively. The relative standard deviation (n=10) at 100 μg L−1of Cu (II) is 2.5%. The applicability of the developed technique was evaluated by application to spiked environmental water samples.

Highlights

  • Sample preparation is an important analytical step especially for the determination of trace analytes in complex sample matrices commonly encountered in environmental and biological analysis [1]

  • Modern trends in analytical chemistry are directed towards the simpli cation and miniaturization of sample preparation, as they lead inherently to a minimum solvent and reagent consumption and drastic reduction of laboratory wastes [2, 3]

  • A er the optimization of experimental variables and determination of analytical features, the applicability of the developed technique was evaluated by application to spiked environmental water samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sample preparation is an important analytical step especially for the determination of trace analytes in complex sample matrices commonly encountered in environmental and biological analysis [1]. Modern trends in analytical chemistry are directed towards the simpli cation and miniaturization of sample preparation, as they lead inherently to a minimum solvent and reagent consumption and drastic reduction of laboratory wastes [2, 3] Considering this aspect, for reducing the analysis step, increasing the sample throughput, and improving the quality and the sensitivity of the analytical methods, several microextraction techniques such as cloud point extraction (CPE) [4, 5], homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction (HLLE) [6, 7], liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [8, 9], and solidphase microextraction (SPME) [10] are being developed. T 1: Comparison of DLLME with other extraction methods for determination of copper in water samples

Method
Experimental
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call