Abstract

To obtain high quality of results in gamma spectrometry, it is necessary to select the best HPGe detector for particular measurements, to calibrate energy and efficiency of gamma detector as accurate as possible. To achieve this aim, the convenient detector model and gamma source can be very useful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the soil specific activity using two HPGe model (BEGe-6530 and GC0818-7600SL) by comparing the results of the two detectors and the technics used according to the detector type. The relative uncertainty activity concentration was calculated for 226Ra, 232Th and 40K. For broad energy germanium detector, BEGe-6530, the relative uncertainty concentration ranged from 2.85 to 3.09% with a mean of 2.99% for 226Ra, from 2.29 to 2.49% with a means of 2.36% for 232Th and from 3.47 to 22.37% with a mean of 12.52% for 40K. For GC0818-7600SL detector, it was ranged from 10.45 to 25.55% with a mean of 17.10% for 226Ra, from 2.54 to 3.56% with a means of 3.10% for 232Th and from 3.42 to 7.65% with a mean of 5.58% for 40K. The average report between GC0818-7600SL model and BEGe-6530 model was calculated and showed the mean value of 3.36. The main study was based on the following points:•Determination of The relative uncertainty activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K•Determination of the relative uncertainty related to the radium equivalent activity to compare the performance of the two detection systems•Proved that the activity concentration determination in gamma spectrometry depended on the energy range emitted by a radionuclide.This study showed that the standard deviation measurement was less important to the result realized with BEGe-6530 HPGe model. Our findings were demonstrated that the results of the Broad Energy Germanium detector were more reliable.

Highlights

  • Please cite this article in press as: G.S.C

  • A first step of this study was made in Cameroon with a Broad Energy Germanium detector (BEGE-6530 model) and a second with an High purity germanium detectors (HPGe) (GC0818-7600SL model) detector took place at the Laboratory of Nuclear Physics of the University of Liege in Belgium

  • In Douala, each sample was subjected to a coaxial gamma-ray spectrometer consisting of broad energy germanium detector (BEGe-6530) manufactured by Canberra Industries

Read more

Summary

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Gamma-rays spectrometry using two HPGe detectors (BEGe-6530 and GC0818-7600SL models) comparison techniques: Application to the soil measurement. [TD$FIRSNAME]25_Guembou Shouop Cebastien [TD$FIRSNAME.]UJoel[TD$SURNAME.]a,b,* , [TD$FIRSNAME]Samafou [TD$FIRSNAME.]UPenabei[TD$SURNAME.]c,. [TD$FIRSNAME]Moyo Maurice [TD$FIRSNAME.]UNdontchueng[TD$SURNAME.]b,d , [TD$FIRSNAME]Gregoire [TD$FIRSNAME.]UChene[TD$SURNAME.]a ,. TD$SURNAME.] , b,c [TD$FIRSNAME]Alexandre Ngwa [TD$FIRSNAME.]UEbongue[TD$SURNAME.] , [TD$FIRSNAME]Motapon [TD$FIRSNAME.]UOusmanou[TD$SURNAME.]b ,. [TD$FIRSNAME]David [TD$FIRSNAME.]UStrivay[TD$SURNAME.]a a Atomic and Nuclear Spectroscopy, Archeometry, University of Liège, Bat. B15 Sart Tilman, 4000 Liege 1, Belgium.

Method details
Sampling and sample preparation
Carbon epoxy
Measurements of activity concentration
NS tS
Radioactivity measurement validation
Sampling Sites
Sample Id
Additional informations
Findings
Output of this research

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.