Abstract

Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in redundancy of lossless coding. The redundancy (regret) of universal fixed-to-variable length coding for a class of sources determines by how much the actual code length exceeds the optimal (ideal over the class) code length. In a minimax scenario one finds the best code for the worst source either in the worst case (called also maximal minimax) or on average. We first study the worst case minimax redundancy over a class of stationary ergodic sources and replace Shtarkov's bound by an exact formula. Among others, we prove that a generalized Shannon code minimizes the worst case redundancy, derive asymptotically its redundancy, and establish some general properties. This allows us to obtain precise redundancy for memoryless, Markov, and renewal sources. For example, we present the exact constant of the redundancy for memoryless and Markov sources by showing that the integer nature of coding contributes log(logm/(m-1))/logm+o(1) where m is the size of the alphabet. Then we deal with the average minimax redundancy and regret. Our approach here is orthogonal to most recent research in this area since we aspire to show that asymptotically the average minimax redundancy is equivalent to the worst case minimax redundancy for some classes of sources. After formulating some general bounds relating these two redundancies, we prove our assertion for memoryless and Markov sources. Nevertheless, we provide evidence that maximal redundancy of renewal processes does not have the same leading term as the average minimax redundancy (however, our general results show that maximal and average regrets are asymptotically equivalent).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.