Preceptor perceptions of a redesigned entrustable professional activity (EPA) assessment tool in pharmacy practice experiences

Abstract

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to determine pharmacy preceptor perceptions of an entrustable professional activity (EPA) evaluation tool redesigned in 2019 and launched for use in May 2020. MethodsParticipants received an optional survey in June 2021 regarding their perceptions of the redesigned EPA assessment tool. The survey used a combination of open- and closed-ended questions regarding preceptor perceptions of the revised form, including perceptions of accuracy, usability, ease of use, grading, EPAs, and form layout. Preceptor perceptions were measured using seven-point Likert-type items and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Open-ended items were coded by at least two faculty members using qualitative content analysis. ResultsWe received 106 responses (19.5% response rate) and analyzed a total of 91 responses. Most questions related to perceived accuracy were rated positively, and preceptors indicated it was easier to assign grades and provide feedback on EPAs using the new form. Preceptors agreed that EPAs indicated when students on clinical rotations excel and when they need to improve. Preceptors reported they could effectively evaluate students and do so in a way that saves them time. Overall, preceptors agreed that the form instructions helped them accurately assess student performance, and the new narratives helped them remember the assessment standards. ConclusionsOverarchingly, preceptors perceived that the new EPA assessment tool allowed them to provide feedback and grades more accurately, efficiently, effectively, and easily. This information will assist our institution in determining next best steps for EPA assessment tool updates.