Abstract
Purpose:The aim of this study was (a) to optimise the99mTc-SPECT reconstruction parameters for the pre-treatment dosimetry of90Y-selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) and (b) to compare the accuracy of clinical dosimetry methods with full Monte-Carlo dosimetry (fMCD) performed with Gate. Methods:To optimise the reconstruction parameters, two hundred reconstructions with different parameters were performed on a NEMA phantom, varying the number of iterations, subsets, and post-filtering. The accuracy of the dosimetric methods was then investigated using an anthropomorphic phantom. Absorbed dose maps were generated using (1) the Partition Model (PM), (2) the Dose Voxel Kernel (DVK) convolution, and (3) the Local Deposition Method (LDM) with known activity restricted to the whole phantom (WP) or to the liver and lungs (LL). The dose to the lungs was calculated using the “multiple DVK” and “multiple LDM” methods. Results:Optimal OSEM reconstruction parameters were found to depend on object size and dosimetric criterion chosen (Dmean or DVH-derived metric). The Dmean of all three dosimetric methods was close (≤ 10%) to the Dmean of fMCD simulations when considering large segmented volumes (whole liver, normal liver). In contrast, the Dmean to the small volume (∅=31) was systemically underestimated (12%–25%). For lungs, the “multiple DVK” and “multiple LDM” methods yielded a Dmean within 20% for the WP method and within 10% for the LL method. Conclusions:All three methods showed a substantial degradation of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) compared to fMCD simulations. The DVK and LDM methods performed almost equally well, with the “multiple DVK” method being more accurate in the lungs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.