Abstract

Task preparation involves multiple component processes, including a general evaluative process that signals the need for adjustments in control, and the engagement of task-specific control settings. Here we examined the dynamics of these different mechanisms in preparing the attentional control system for visual search. We explored preparatory activity using pupil dilation, a well-established measure of task demands and effortful processing. In an initial exploratory experiment, participants were cued at the start of each trial to search for either a salient color singleton target (an easy search task) or a low-salience shape singleton target (a difficult search task). Pupil dilation was measured during the preparation period from cue onset to search display onset. Mean dilation was larger in preparation for the difficult shape target than the easy color target. In two additional experiments, we sought to vary effects of evaluative processing and task-specific preparation separately. Experiment 2 showed that when the color and shape search tasks were matched for difficulty, the shape target no longer evoked larger dilations, and the pattern of results was in fact reversed. In Experiment 3, we manipulated difficulty within a single feature dimension, and found that the difficult search task evoked larger dilations. These results suggest that pupil dilation reflects expectations of difficulty in preparation for a search task, consistent with the activity of an evaluative mechanism. We did not find consistent evidence for relationship between pupil dilation and search performance (accuracy and response timing), suggesting that pupil dilation during search preparation may not be strongly linked to ongoing task-specific preparation.

Highlights

  • Every day we engage in a variety of complex, cognitively demanding tasks

  • We examined whether pupil dilation predicted trial-by-trial search performance using a linear mixed effects model

  • We found no relationship between pupil dilation and accuracy (p = .57) and no interaction with target type in predicting accuracy (p = .36)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Every day we engage in a variety of complex, cognitively demanding tasks. For each new task, the attentional control system must be reconfigured to ensure that only currently relevant information is prioritized. The results from the evaluative process determine whether, and to what extent, task-specific preparation should be engaged This second stage involves the activation of task sets, cognitive settings tailored to the operations that must be performed in the upcoming task [7,8,9]. We addressed two main questions: 1) Does pupil dilation reflect evaluative processing, responding to the anticipated attentional demands of the upcoming search task? We will conclude that pre-stimulus pupil appears linked to evaluative processing, but we make no strong claims about how it relates to task-specific processing and leave this latter issue open to further investigation In this initial experiment, participants searched for one of two possible targets in a search display: a color singleton and a shape singleton (Fig 1A). The effect would be driven by the expectations of the observer regarding the difficulty of the upcoming task and

Method
Results and discussion
Results

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.