Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor outcome. Many patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, and in a considerable proportion, abutment or invasion of visceral arteries is present. Moreover, some patients have anatomical variations or stenosis of major visceral arteries requiring arterial reconstruction upon pancreatic cancer resection to avoid organ ischemia. Simultaneous arterial reconstruction during resection is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. This trial evaluates the approach of visceral debranching, that is, arterial reconstruction, prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and tumor resection in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.Methods and Analysis: The trial includes patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic pancreatic cancer with arterial abutment or invasion (deemed primarily unresectable), variations in vascular anatomy, or stenosis of visceral arteries. The participants undergo visceral debranching, followed by current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine–nab-paclitaxel, or other) and potential subsequent tumor resection. The primary outcome is feasibility, measured as the proportion of patients who start neoadjuvant therapy within 6 weeks of visceral debranching. The trial has an exact single-stage design. The proportion below which the treatment is considered ineffective is set at 0.7 (H0). The proportion above which the treatment warrants further exploration in a phase III trial is set at 0.9 (H1). With a power (1-beta) of 0.8 and a type 1 mistake (alpha) of 0.05, the required sample size is 28 patients. Feasibility of the approach will be assumed if 24 of the enrolled 28 patients proceed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks from visceral debranching.Discussion: This trial evaluates a new treatment sequence, that is, visceral debranching followed by chemotherapy and resection, for pancreatic cancer with invasion or abutment of visceral arteries. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate feasibility. Trial results will allow for estimating treatment effects and calculating the sample size of a randomized controlled trial, in which the approach will be tested if the feasibility endpoint is met.Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04136769.

Highlights

  • Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor outcome

  • We present the protocol of a clinical trial assessing the feasibility of visceral debranching followed by chemotherapy and resection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

  • Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint of the trial is the proportion of patients proceeding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among all patients undergoing visceral debranching

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor outcome. Many patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, and in a considerable proportion, abutment or invasion of visceral arteries is present. A major obstacle to a safe and oncologically successful resection is the abutment or encasement of large visceral arteries, namely, the celiac trunk or the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), by the tumor. Such invasion or abutment is present in up to a third of patients upon diagnosis [2, 3]. Some patients have variations in vascular anatomy with aberrant or aplastic visceral arteries or occlusive disease of the celiac trunk or SMA [4, 5] In such situations, there is exclusive or predominant vascularization of the mesentery or liver via collateral vessels, which need to be ligated during tumor resection. If complete resection of the tumor is aimed for, arterial reconstruction is required to prevent organ ischemia

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.