Abstract

Background: Low response rates in randomised controlled trials can compromise the reliability of the results, so ways to boost retention are often implemented. Although there is evidence to suggest that sending a text message to participants increases retention, there is little evidence around the timing or personalisation of these messages. Methods: A two-by-two factorial SWAT (study within a trial) was embedded within the MiQuit-3 trial, looking at smoking cessation within pregnant smokers. Participants who reached their 36-week gestational follow-up were randomised to receive a personalised or non-personalised text message, either one week or one day prior to the telephone follow-up. Primary outcomes were completion rate of questionnaire via telephone. Secondary outcomes included: completion rate via any method, time to completion, and number of reminders required. Results In total 194 participants were randomised into the SWAT; 50 to personalised early text, 47 to personalised late text, 50 to non-personalised early text, and 47 to non-personalised late text. There was no evidence that timing of the text message (early: one week before; or late: one day before) had an effect on any of the outcomes. There was evidence that a personalised text would result in fewer completions via telephone compared with a non-personalised text (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.87, p=0.02). However, there was no evidence to show that personalisation or not was better for any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion Timing of the text message does not appear to influence the retention of participants. Personalisation of a text message may be detrimental to retention; however, more SWATs should be undertaken in this field.

Highlights

  • Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the ‘gold standard’ for evaluating healthcare treatments

  • Timing of the text message does not appear to influence the retention of participants

  • Personalisation of a text message may be detrimental to retention; more study within a trial (SWAT) should be undertaken in this field

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the ‘gold standard’ for evaluating healthcare treatments. There is insufficient evidence to determine if the timing of text messages improves questionnaire response rates, and limited papers exploring if personalisation (inclusion of the participants name) impacts response rate[8,9,10,11]. This SWAT aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the timing and personalisation of text messages within an RCT to add to the evidence base for both of these interventions. Low response rates in randomised controlled trials can compromise the reliability of the results, so ways to boost retention are often implemented. There is evidence to suggest that sending a text message to participants increases retention, there is little evidence around the timing or personalisation of these messages

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call