Abstract

Background: Guidelines for acute coronary syndrome management advocate a 12-lead electrocardiogram should be taken en route and transmitted to prenotify the receiving medical facility. The aim is to obtain a door-to-balloon time (DTBT) <90mins. We sought to analyse the benefits of prenotification. Method: Excluding cardiac arrest, consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI between 2011-2016 from the MIG registry were included with analysis separated into prenotified and non-prenotified groups. Results: 1134 prenotified (38.6%) and 1806 non-prenotified (61.4%) cases were compared. The prenotified group has a higher proportion of patients >75yo (29.0% vs 22.8%, p = 0.01) and have an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 (28.2% vs 22.7%, p<0.01), but a similar cardiogenic shock rate (6.7% vs 5.2%, p = 0.12). The prenotified group has a higher thrombus aspiration use (30.2% vs 22.4%, p < 0.001), glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitor use (66.6% vs 53.4%, p < 0.001), RCA intervention (47.1% vs 36.5%, p < 0.001) and bare metal stent use (40.5%vs36.0%, p < 0.05) with similar procedural success (95.7% vs 95.2%, p = 0.54). Prenotification leads to a 36 min shorter DTBT (52mins vs 88mins, p < 0.001). Prenotification increases total DTBT < 90mins (88.9% vs 51.3%, p < 0.001), increases in hours DTBT<90mins (93.3% vs 61.6%, p < 0.001) and after hours DTBT < 90mins (85.6 vs 46.0%, p < 0.001). Prenotification has a higher in-hospital (4.6% vs 2.9%, p < 0.05) and 30-day mortality (5.1% vs 3.6%, p < 0.05). Prenotification is not an independent predictor for 30-day mortality (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91-2.07). Conclusion: Although prenotification dramatically improves DTBTs (especially after hours) and reduces total ischaemic time, early mortality is not lower. The effect on long term mortality after STEMI is eagerly awaited.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call