Abstract

The planned nature of live donor kidney transplantation allows for immunosuppression to be initiated in the pretransplant period. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pre-emptive immunosuppression on acute rejection rates after live donor kidney transplantation. In two consecutive cohorts of live donor kidneys transplants, 99 patients received pre-emptive immunosuppression with tacrolimus monotherapy for 2weeks prior to transplantation (PET group - first era) and 100 patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression commencing on the day of transplantation (control group - second era). The main outcome measure was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in the first 3months post-transplantation. Tacrolimus levels were significantly higher in the PET group at day 4 post-transplant (PET 9.08±4.57 vs. control 5.92±3.64ng/ml; P<0.0001), but there were no significant differences in tacrolimus levels at day 7 (PET 8.22±3.58 vs. control 7.63±3.56ng/ml; P=0.2452). BPAR was numerically higher in the PET group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (PET 13/99 vs. control 6/100; P=0.097). There were no differences in allograft function measured by serum creatinine at 1year (PET 130±36 vs. control 142±69μmol/l; P=0.6829). Graft survival at 1year was equivalent in both groups (PET 96.9 vs. control 97.0%; P=0.9915). This study suggests that there is little role for the use of pre-emptive tacrolimus monotherapy in ABO blood group and HLA-compatible live donor kidney transplantation in patients on triple maintenance immunosuppression.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.