Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for the management of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, DBS is indicated as the disease progresses and motor complications derived from pharmacological therapy arise. Here, we evaluate the potential of DBS prior to levodopa (L-Dopa) in improving quality of life (QoL), challenging the state of the art for DBS therapy. We present data on clinical manifestation, decision finding during early indication to DBS, and trajectories after DBS. We further discuss current paradigms for DBS and hypothesize on possible mechanisms. Six patients, between 50 and 67 years old, presenting at least 5 years of PD symptoms, and without L-Dopa therapy initiation, received subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS implantation. In the six PD cases, indication for DBS was not driven by motor complications, as supported by current guidelines, but by relevant QoL impairment and patient’s reluctance to initiate L-Dopa treatment. All patients treated with STN-DBS prior to L-Dopa presented improvement in motor and non-motor symptoms and significant QoL improvement. All patients reduced the intake of dopamine agonists, and five are currently free from L-Dopa medication, with no reported adverse events. We introduce a multicenter observational study to investigate whether early DBS treatment may affect the natural course of PD. Early application of DBS instead of L-Dopa administration could have a pathophysiological basis and be prompted by a significant incline on QoL through disease progression; however, the clinical value of this proposed paradigm shift should be addressed in clinical trials aimed at modulating the natural course of PD.

Highlights

  • The treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients should aim to control both motor and nonmotor symptoms to maintain optimal functioning in daily-life activities while preventing further motor complications and minimizing the risk of long-term side effects, positively modifying the natural course of disease.deep brain stimulation (DBS) Before L-DopaLevodopa (L-Dopa) therapy is the most common and efficient pharmacological solution to control motor symptoms; notorious complications such as motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and wearing-offs develop, significantly impacting the quality of life (QoL) (Ray Chaudhuri et al, 2018)

  • The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant change in the UPDRS-III scores [p = 0.001, F(3,20) = 8.1], for differences between med-OFF and L-Dopa challenge (p = 0.0009, T = 6) and effects of DBS in comparison with med-OFF (p = 0.0004, T = 7.2) and to L-Dopa challenge (p = 0.02, T = 2.7)

  • UPDRS-motor scores assessed in the DBS clinics at L-Dopa challenge improved an average of 60.7%, whereas after DBS implantation, UPDRS-III improved 66% on average, spanning from 48–94.7% (Figure 1), and stable during follow-up periods ranging from 3 months to 9 years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients should aim to control both motor and nonmotor symptoms to maintain optimal functioning in daily-life activities while preventing further motor complications and minimizing the risk of long-term side effects, positively modifying the natural course of disease. Levodopa (L-Dopa) therapy is the most common and efficient pharmacological solution to control motor symptoms; notorious complications such as motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and wearing-offs develop, significantly impacting the quality of life (QoL) (Ray Chaudhuri et al, 2018). DBS is currently indicated at later disease stages, when the pharmacological strategies are not sufficient for controlling motor complications (dyskinesia, fluctuations, and wearingoff) or if the patient has motor symptoms that do not respond sufficiently to standard oral treatments (i.e., refractory rest tremor)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call