Abstract

ObjectivesMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease frequently involving the spinal cord, which can be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Here, we hypothesize that pre-contrast T1-w imaging does not add diagnostic value to routine spinal MRI for the follow-up of patients with MS.Methods3-T MRI scans including pre- and post-contrast T1-w as well as T2-w images of 265 consecutive patients (mean age: 40 ± 13 years, 169 women) with (suspected) MS were analyzed retrospectively. Images were assessed in two separate reading sessions, first excluding and second including pre-contrast T1-w images. Two independent neuroradiologists rated the number of contrast-enhancing (ce) lesions as well as diagnostic confidence (1 = unlikely to 5 = very high), overall image quality, and artifacts. Results were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests and weighted Cohen’s kappa (κ).ResultsFifty-six ce lesions were found in 43 patients. There were no significant differences in diagnostic confidence between both readings for both readers (reader 1: p = 0.058; reader 2: p = 0.317). Inter-rater concordance was both moderate regarding artifacts (κ = 0.418) and overall image quality (κ = 0.504). Thirty-one black holes were found in 25 patients with high diagnostic confidence (reader 1: 4.04 ± 0.81; reader 2: 3.80 ± 0.92) and substantial inter-rater concordance (κ = 0.700).ConclusionsAvailability of pre-contrast T1-w images did not significantly increase diagnostic confidence or detection rate of ce lesions in the spinal cord in patients with MS. Thus, pre-contrast T1-w sequences might be omitted in routine spinal MRI for follow-up exams, however not in special unclear clinical situations in which certainty on contrast enhancement is required.Key PointsAvailability of pre-contrast T1-w images does not increase diagnostic confidence or detection rate of contrast-enhancing lesions in the spinal cord of MS patients.Excluding pre-contrast T1-w sequences reduces scan time, thus providing more time for other sequences or increasing the patients’ compliance.

Highlights

  • ObjectivesMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease frequently involving the spinal cord, which can be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

  • Final diagnoses for the 265 patients established by the treating neurologists included suspected or definite Multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 203), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS; n = 41), radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS; n = 3), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD; n = 8), psychosomatic disorders (n = 5), or remained unclear (n = 5)

  • 183/265 (69%) patients showed 745 T2hyperintense lesions in the spinal cord (Table 2), with 395/ 745 (53%) lesions being located in the cervical and 350/745 (47%) lesions being located in the thoracic spinal cord. 255/ 745 (34%) lesions were predominantly located centrally in the gray matter and 490/745 (66%) lesions were predominantly located peripherally in the white matter. 696/745 (93%) lesions had a circumscribed appearance and 49/745 (7%) showed a longitudinally extensive configuration of at least two vertebral heights

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease frequently involving the spinal cord, which can be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesize that pre-contrast T1-w imaging does not add diagnostic value to routine spinal MRI for the follow-up of patients with MS. Two independent neuroradiologists rated the number of contrast-enhancing (ce) lesions as well as diagnostic confidence (1 = unlikely to 5 = very high), overall image quality, and artifacts. Thirty-one black holes were found in 25 patients with high diagnostic confidence (reader 1: 4.04 ± 0.81; reader 2: 3.80 ± 0.92) and substantial inter-rater concordance (κ = 0.700). Conclusions Availability of pre-contrast T1-w images did not significantly increase diagnostic confidence or detection rate of ce lesions in the spinal cord in patients with MS. Pre-contrast T1-w sequences might be omitted in routine spinal MRI for follow-up exams, not in special unclear clinical situations in which certainty on contrast enhancement is required

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call