Abstract

The development of bone substitute materials (BSMs) intended for load-bearing bone defects is highly complicated, as biological and mechanical requirements are often contradictory. In recent years, biological BSMs have been developed which allow for a more efficient integration of the material with the surrounding osseous environment and, hence, a higher mechanical stability of the treated defect. However, while these materials are promising, they are still far from ideal. Consequently, extensive preclinical experimentation is still required. The current review provides a comprehensive overview of biomechanical considerations relevant for the design of biological BSMs. Further, the preclinical evaluation of biological BSMs intended for application in highly loaded skeletal sites is discussed. The selected animal models and implantation site should mimic the pathophysiology and biomechanical loading patterns of human bone as closely as possible. In general, sheep are among the most frequently selected animal models for the evaluation of biomaterials intended for highly loaded skeletal sites. Regarding the anatomical sites, segmental bone defects created in the limbs and spinal column are suggested as the most suitable. Furthermore, the outcome measurements used to assess biological BSMs for regeneration of defects in heavily loaded bone should be relevant and straightforward. The quantitative evaluation of bone defect healing through ex vivo biomechanical tests is a valuable addition to conventional in vivo tests, as it determines the functional efficacy of BSM-induced bone healing. Finally, we conclude that further standardization of preclinical studies is essential for reliable evaluation of biological BSMs in highly loaded skeletal sites.

Highlights

  • Despite the remarkable capacity of bone tissue to regenerate itself after damage, critically sized, load-bearing bone defects will not heal spontaneously without surgical intervention [1,2]

  • The relevant aspects of preclinical animal models for the quantitative evaluation of biological bone substitute materials (BSMs) intended for application in highly loaded skeletal sites are reviewed

  • While some authors argue that the strength of the BSMs should be higher than the bone it replaces [39], clinical experience related to PMMA-based cements seems to suggest otherwise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the remarkable capacity of bone tissue to regenerate itself after damage, critically sized, load-bearing bone defects will not heal spontaneously without surgical intervention [1,2]. Autografts are not unlimitedly available, and their harvest often causes donor site morbidity [4,5] In this context, the development of bone substitute materials (BSM) with a biological performance comparable to native bone and the capacity to withstand substantial mechanical loading in situ is required [6]. The preclinical translation of BSM for application in highly loaded skeletal sites has gained considerable interest during the past decades, as mimicking human non-union or delayed bone healing conditions in animal models is extremely complex. The current review aims to analyze the load-bearing capacity of bone tissue and to provide a comprehensive overview of the relevant biological and mechanical considerations for the design of BSMs. the relevant aspects of preclinical animal models for the quantitative evaluation of biological BSMs intended for application in highly loaded skeletal sites are reviewed

The Adaptive Load-Bearing Capacity of Bone
Biomechanical Considerations for the Design of BSMs
Animal Models for Critical Load-Bearing Bone Defects
Selection of the Animal Species
Selection of Implantation Site
Fixation Method
Method of Vertebrae Dislocation
Acessory Treatment Conditions
Implantation Period
Outcome Measurements
Progress in the BSM Field—Clinical Translatability
Findings
Closing Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call