Abstract
Five case studies of collapse of surface crown pillars from Western Australia and the Northern Territory were analysed. It was found that there was a pattern in the geotechnical behaviour of the rock mass prior and after the collapse. The pattern indicated that the hangingwall was deteriorating years or months prior to collapse. Weeks before, level pillars were collapsing and broken rock rilled down the stopes. Within days or even hours before the collapse, rock noises and rock falls were reported in various parts of the mines. To monitor different behaviour of the rock mass it is recommended that appropriate geotechnical instrumentation and monitoring be used. Deterioration in ground conditions can be triggered by external sources like mass blasting or a seismic event. After the collapse, the postfailure behaviour in a from of further ground collapse and gradual movement continued for a number of years.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.