Abstract
‘Dans les ouvrages consacrés au théâtre français’, writes Sandrine Berrégard, ‘les Arguments ne sont presque jamais commentés’ (p. 9). Even when it is roundly acknowledged that paratextual analysis decisively informs our understanding of early modern theatre, it is all too easy to cast aside the ‘Argument’, a summary of the events to come in the play, as a sporadic and unenlightening relic of bygone eras. What the author admirably demonstrates is that, in spite of the lack of modern scholarship on the ‘Argument’, it is a text which ‘ouvre […] la voie à une nouvelle conception du texte dramatique et de sa réalisation scénique’ (p. 396). Through a comprehensive overview of the development of the ‘Argument’ in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries (with its appearances usefully catalogued at the end of the book), Berrégard’s study makes the case for a re-evaluation of its critical and metatextual value. It is first...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.