Prasugrel-Based De-Escalation in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromeAccording to Renal Function.

Abstract

Patients with coronary artery disease and impaired renal function are at higher risk for both bleeding and ischemic adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a prasugrel-based de-escalation strategy in patients with impaired renal function. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS study. Patients with available estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (n=2,311) were categorized into 3 groups. (high eGFR: >90mL/min; intermediate eGFR: 60 to 90mL/min; and low eGFR:<60mL/min). The end points were bleeding outcomes (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or higher), ischemic outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, repeated revascularization, and ischemic stroke), and net adverse clinical event (including any clinical event) at 1-year follow-up. Prasugrel de-escalation was beneficial regardless of baseline renal function (P for interaction=0.508). The relative reduction in bleeding risk from prasugrel de-escalation was higher in the low eGFR group than in both the intermediate and high eGFR groups (relative reductions, respectively: 64% (HR: 0.36; 95%CI: 0.15-0.83) vs 50% (HR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.28-0.90) and 52% (HR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.21-1.13) (P for interaction=0.646). Ischemic risk from prasgurel de-escalation was not significant in all eGFR groups (HR: 1.18 [95%CI: 0.47-2.98], HR: 0.95 [95%CI: 0.53-1.69], and HR: 0.61 [95%CI: 0.26-1.39]) (P for interaction=0.119). In patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving PCI, prasugrel dose de-escalation was beneficial regardless of the baseline renal function.