Abstract
ABSTRACT Practitioner research is often promoted in education for different purposes, usually with the aim of fostering practitioners’ professional development while supporting their identity as practitioner-researchers. Within this landscape, teachers and academics sometimes work together to engage in different forms of collaborative practitioner research. Such endeavours, however, may generate some ethical issues among the academics involved. In this article, we, two university-based academics, reflect on methodological insights by discussing two ethical dilemmas about practitioner research resulting from recent situations: (1) transparency in designing, promoting, doing, and reporting on practitioner research, and (2) the potential co-option of practitioner research initiatives and outcomes. Qua duoethnographic research, this reflective piece adopts an epistolary technique as the shape of the article as it consists of a series of emails exchanged between the authors over a period of time. In so doing, we aim for transparency about how our insights around the ethical issues identified developed organically through written interaction. We concur that it is time for a reality check disposition to disrupt hegemonic onto-epistemic discourses which characterize the ecology of practitioner inquiry.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Research & Method in Education
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.