Abstract

Wisdom is not an innate character trait; no one automatically is wise; wisdom is learned and acquired. More importantly, one can learn and acquire wisdom intentionally and skillfully — one can practice it. And, if the practice is structured in particular ways, the practice will improve one’s capacities to act with wisdom. This article clarifies theoretical muddiness and pedagogical imprecision by bringing together two important and robust strands of legal ethics literature. The first strand focuses on what the appropriate role of a lawyer is in a just society, while the second focuses on how a lawyer learns to be, or is formed into, a professional. Neither strand regularly considers the other. By putting the two strands into conversation, we demonstrate that a lawyer can learn to be wise, but that such wisdom must be situated within a normative end goal. The idea of practical wisdom has its roots in Aristotelian traditions. Much of the discourse about practical wisdom has focused on it as a desired end state. While that is an important inquiry, it misses a key question — how does one become practically wise. Our article offers a new answer. It describes a set of processes and capacities to develop practical wisdom — what the authors call “practicing practical wisdom.”

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.