Abstract

This study aims to investigate the opinions of teachers working at public, private, and International Baccalaureate (IB) Schools on the evaluation practices, the use of assessment tools, the frequency of documenting data, and the feedback frequencies given to both students, and parents. A questionnaire has been used to collect data from 168 teachers. 84 of these teachers were from public schools, 30 from IB, and 54 from private schools.Percentages and frequencies were examined to describe the data, and the chi-square test was conducted for their distribution. There are two main conclusions derived. The first one is that state schools and private schools differ from IB schools in terms of exam-oriented preparation and evaluations when traditional methods are employed. The second one is that IB schools differ from state schools and private schools in terms of documenting the data and reporting of assessment for learning improvement and process-based evaluation. In terms of teachers` opinions, the ones from the IB schools believed there was a difference in terms of having an assessment policy, collaborative planning processes with partners, and experts, taking into consideration the individual differences, and having an inspection mechanism to monitor of the processes.

Highlights

  • The education system of each country gains functionality in line with the features of its curriculum

  • Since this study aims to compare schools in terms of the assessed characteristics, the number of teachers working in International Baccalaureate (IB) primary years, middle years, and schools implementing diploma programs were kept higher than the ratio of schools of population. 95 (56%) of the participants are women, and 73 (44%) are men. 26 (16%) of the participants work in preschool, 44 (26%) in primary school, (31%) in secondary school, and (31%) in high school

  • The answers of teachers to open-ended questions were analyzed in the data obtained via "what are the concepts that come to the minds first of teachers in public schools, IB schools, and private schools when "measurement, and evaluation" mentioned?" question

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The education system of each country gains functionality in line with the features of its curriculum. Aims of education of any subject area can be determined and analyzed in advance within the scope of community and student characteristics. The content, method, and learning environment of education are specified within the frame of expert views, and studies. Evaluation means the level of achieving the goal (Demirel, 2012; Ertürk, 2013). Curriculum elements can be reviewed following the results of the evaluation (Demirel, 2012; Ertürk, 2013). Studentsand teachersopinions, preferences, perceptions are more prominent than the expert opinions regarding the decisions to be taken for the curriculum (Demirel, 2012; Ertürk, 2013). The adopted design approach brings along the differentiation of the goals, educational status, content, measurement, and evaluation method

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call