Practice patterns in revision dacryocystorhinostomy

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to report the practice patterns while performing revision dacryocystorhinostomy (RevDCR) amongst oculoplastic surgeons from several regions across the globe. Methods The survey consisted of 41 specific questions sent via email that contained a link to the Google forms. The questions covered several aspects of the respondents’ practice profiles, evaluation methods, pre-operative choices, surgical techniques, and follow-up preferences while dealing with patients of prior failed DCRs. Questions were answerable either as multiple choice or free text typing. The survey respondents were anonymized. The responses were collected and analyzed, and data were tabulated to understand the preferred practice trends. Results A total of 137 surgeons completed the survey. Most respondents identified themselves as experienced surgeons managing failed DCRs (76.6%, total respondents (n) = 137). The commonly preferred modalities for evaluation of a failed DCR were lacrimal irrigation (91.2%) and nasal endoscopy (66.9%). About 64% (87/137) of the respondents performed a combination of nasal endoscopy, lacrimal irrigation, and probing to localize the area of the failed DCR. A majority of the respondents used anti-metabolites (73.3%, n = 131) and stents (96.4%, 132/137) during the revision surgery. Most surgeons preferred endoscopic approach (44.5%), (61/137) for revising a failed DCR and most preferred general anaesthesia with local infiltration (70.1%, 96/137). Aggressive fibrosis with cicatricial closure was identified as the most frequently encountered cause of failure (84.6%, 115/137). The osteotomy was performed on an as-needed basis by 59.1% (81/137) of the surgeons. Only 10.9% of the respondents used navigation guidance while performing a revision DCR, mainly for post-trauma scenarios. Most of the surgeons completed the revision procedure within 30–60 minutes (77.4%, 106/137). The self-reported outcomes of revision DCRs were good (80–95%, median-90%, n = 137). Conclusion A significantly high percentage of oculoplastic surgeons who responded to this survey from across the globe performed nasal endoscopy in their pre-operative evaluations, preferred endoscopic surgical approach, and used antimetabolites and stents while performing revision DCRs.