Practice Patterns Among Hand Surgeons According to Primary Residency Training: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Study.

Abstract

Hand surgery fellowships accept applicants from 3 different residencies: general surgery, orthopedic surgery, and plastic surgery. Although all of these specialties culminate into a board-certified hand surgeon, each specialty receives drastically different training in residency, which can have effects on which procedures these surgeons feel comfortable performing in their own practices. This study aims to compare practice patterns and complication rates among hand surgeons by residency training. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried between the years of 2014 and 2018 for all Current Procedural Terminology codes pertaining to upper-extremity surgical procedures performed below the elbow. Procedures not performed by a general, orthopedic, or plastic surgeon were excluded, as well as polytraumas. Procedures were then stratified by anatomic region, tissue type, and primary specialty of the attending surgeon. Data collected included the number of each procedure, patient complexity, and complications. Statistical analysis consisted of a t test for continuous variables, χ2 analysis for categorical variables, and linear regression analysis to compare complications rates between specialties. A total of 76,980 unique cases were included in our analysis: 4979 (6.4%) at the elbow, 43,680 (56.7%) at the forearm/wrist, 23,284 (30.2%) at the hand, 1421 (1.8%) flaps/grafts, 285 (0.4%) vascular, and 3331 (4.3%) neurological. Orthopedics performed most (79.5%) of the procedures, whereas plastic surgeons and general surgeons performed 17.3% and 3.1%, respectively. There were also significant differences by anatomic location/type of procedure, with orthopedic surgeons performing 99.2% of procedures at the elbow but only 67.7% of procedures at the hand. Linear regression analysis showed general surgeons had the lowest complication rates. Our data show significant differences in the number of upper-extremity surgeries performed by surgeons from each specialty at different anatomic locations.This could be due to differences in training during residency or proportionately more orthopedic surgeons being "full-time" hand surgeons. These data could affect hiring patterns in hospitals seeking hand surgeons depending on the variety of pathology encountered at that particular institution.