Abstract

A direct relation between antibiotic use and resistance has been shown at country level. We aim to investigate the association between antibiotic prescribing for patients from individual Dutch primary care practices and antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolates from routinely submitted urine samples from their patient populations. Practices’ antibiotic prescribing data were obtained from the Julius Network and related to numbers of registered patients. Practices were classified as low-, middle- or high-prescribers and from each group size-matching practices were chosen. Culture and susceptibility data from submitted urine samples were obtained from the microbiology laboratory. Percentages of resistant isolates, and resistant isolates per 1000 registered patients per year (population resistance) were calculated and compared between the groups. The percentages of resistant Escherichia coli varied considerably between individual practices, but the three prescribing groups’ means were very similar. However, as the higher-prescribing practices requested more urine cultures per 1000 registered patients, population resistance was markedly higher in the higher-prescribing groups. This study showed that the highly variable resistance percentages for individual practices were unrelated to antibiotic prescribing levels. However, population resistance (resistant strains per practice population) was related to antibiotic prescribing levels, which was shown to coincide with numbers of urine culture requests. Whether more urine culture requests in the higher-prescribing groups were related to treatment failures, more complex patient populations, or to general practitioners’ testing behaviour needs further investigation.

Highlights

  • Due to inappropriate antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become one of the most challenging problems in global health [1]

  • When comparing the numbers of prescribed subgroups: amoxicillin, amoxi/clav, nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, ciprofloxacin and macrolides, it appeared that the medium- and high-prescriber groups prescribed more of all these antibiotics

  • When resistant isolates were related to the number of registered patients in a practice, a rising rate was found from low- to high-antibiotic prescribing practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to inappropriate antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become one of the most challenging problems in global health [1]. Many initiatives at local, national, and international levels have tried to raise awareness of inappropriate antibiotic use and AMR-related problems [3,4]. Successes of such initiatives rely on high-quality evidence linking antibiotic use to AMR. Despite the fact that AMR is mainly seen as a problem in secondary care, general practitioners (GPs) are confronted with AMR mainly by the susceptibility results of the patients’ urine samples that they send in for Antibiotics 2020, 9, 470; doi:10.3390/antibiotics9080470 www.mdpi.com/journal/antibiotics

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call