Abstract
This chapter demonstrates that in colonial Bengal, history and history-writing emerged through a re-articulation of the ‘problem’ of practice. ‘Primitives’ were incapable of valid practice. Literary theories today distinguish the symbol from figures like irony and allegory precisely in terms of its temporal significance. Rabindranath’s poetics and critique of nationalism stopped short of becoming a political strategy of resistance to universal forms of knowledge and representation. Bengali middle classes continued to imagine poetics as a site removed from the everyday of colonial unfreedom, and continued to imagine it as a surrogate of nationalist practice. Despite the poetic and potentially political insight—that ‘primitives’ were the last inappropriable location in colonial modernity—the Bengali discourse of poetics as practice failed to produce an alternative politics of time, which, as Rabindranath thought possible, would free the nation from the debilitating linearity of progress.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.