Abstract

BackgroundContinuous video-EEG (cvEEG) monitoring is a vastly utilized tool for monitoring critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Our study investigates the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of using MRI Compatible EEG electrode system for patients being monitored in the intensive care unit. MethodsThis retrospective study included 14 critically ill patients who underwent cvEEG between March 2019 to March 2020. They were classified into 2 subgroups: Group 1- ‘MRI-compatible EEG’ (mean age: 56.00 ± 19.99 years; M:F = 2:5; N = 7), Group 2 – ‘Conventional EEG’ (mean age: 49.14 ± 24.76 years; M:F = 4:3; N = 7). The EEG monitoring times as well as cost-effectiveness of cvEEG between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney Test (p ≤ 0.05). We also compared the MRI quality between the groups using Chi-squared test (p ≤ 0.05). ResultsThe EEG non-monitored time in Group 2 (7.62 ± 6.45 h) was significantly higher than Group 1 (2.71 ± 2.34 h)] (p = 0.025). The average daily cost for cvEEG in Group 1 ($2098.53 ± 493.58) and Group 2 ($2230.58 ± 142.73) was comparable (p = 0.896). The quality of MRI scans between Group 1 (6/7) and 2 (6/7) were also comparable (p = 1.000). ConclusionsThe monitoring time lost in patients with MRI Compatible EEG electrodes was significantly lower than the patients with Conventional EEG electrodes. The daily cost of monitoring and the quality of MRI scans were comparable between the 2 groups. We conclude that the use of MRI Compatible EEG electrodes is a practical and cost-effective method to improve the quality of monitoring in critically ill patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.