Abstract

A non-intrusive load monitoring system (NILM) was installed in three commercial buildings, and evaluated for its ability to disaggregate electric loads. The system largely failed to identify specific loads, leading the authors to identify three key factors that make non-intrusive load identification systematically difficult in mid-size commercial buildings, including the number and complexity of loads, difficulty in interpreting small changes in power consumption, and inability to identify continuously operating loads. Additionally, obtaining data sets for the evaluation of NILM technologies in actual buildings is hampered by disruptions to occupants, misidentification errors, measurement errors, and expense. Enhancements to basic NILM approaches include tagging key devices to facilitate identification, hybrid or supplemental metering, and applying insights from engineering knowledge and audits.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call