Abstract

Various techniques have been established in geotechnical engineering to determine the quality of rock drilled out from a borehole. These simple and inexpensive methods include total core recovery (TCR), solid core recovery (SCR), and rock quality designation (RQD). Among these, RQD provides a general indication of rock mass quality and is widely used as an index to evaluate rock quality by expressing the degree of fracturing in drill cores. The RQD was modified from the TCR method by Deere (1963) to indirectly measure the number of fractures and amount of softening or/and alteration in rock mass for engineering applications. Its simplicity, low cost, and reproducibility generally resulted in quick development of the RQD for a wide variety of rock engineering applications, such as tunnels, mining engineering, and large caverns. Nowadays, this method is considered as a standard method in drill core logging and forms a basic element of the most widely used rock mass classification systems, such as the rock mass rating (RMR) and Q-system (Bieniawski 1989; Barton 1995). However, a number of limitations such as dependence on borehole orientation and the selected threshold value for the minimum intact core length restrict the consistency of the measured values. Accordingly, several methods have been established to overcome these limitations, such as the corrected rock quality designation (RQDc) (Li et al. 2009), volumetric joint density (Jv) (Palmstrom 1982, 1985, 1986; Sen and Eissa 1992), cumulative core index (Sen 1990), and weighted joint density (WJD) (Palmstrom 1995, 2005). Although such new methods have been developed, the RQD is still used with the initial definition, without correction, in many geotechnical engineering applications, e.g., rock mass classification, rock mass strength, and modulus of elasticity. This paper reviews the conventional RQD measurement techniques by Deere (1963) and RQD measurements from the WJD (hereafter called RQDWJD) by Palmstrom (2005) using rock cores drilled out from directional boreholes at the Bakhtiary Dam site. In this way, the RQD values from different methods were compared, and a new modification is proposed, called RQDM-WJD.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.