Abstract
<h3>Practical Applications Summary</h3> In <b>The Impact of Performance Fees on Multi-Manager CTA Portfolios</b>, published in the Fall 2019 issue of <b><i>The Journal of Alternative Investments</i></b>, <b>Kathryn Kaminski</b> of <b>AlphaSimplex Group</b> and <b>Marat Molyboga</b> of <b>Efficient Capital Management</b> quantify the relative performance of traditional and pooled fee structures for multi-manager commodity trading advisor (CTA) portfolios. Absent their simulation approach to estimating performance differences, the relative impact of these fee structures is not plainly evident. Databases of CTA returns not only suffer from several biases, but also report returns net of fees. This net fee return may not be applicable to a host of investors that can negotiate different fees and fee structures. Manager fees represent a very large portion of gross CTA portfolio returns. The authors examine relative net portfolio returns and Sharpe ratios for different fee structures, levels of management fees and incentive fees, and across different crystallization frequencies and different numbers of managers within CTA portoflios. The results are important to investors who wish to make informed, net return-maximizing decisions regarding fee structures and fee-related characteristics for multi-manager CTA portfolio investments. <b>TOPICS:</b>Commodities, futures and forward contracts, performance measurement
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
