Abstract

Contribution: Practical active learning stations (PALSs)-equipped classrooms function similar to prototypical active learning classrooms (ALCs). They support student collaboration and active learning pedagogies but at a fraction of the cost. Background: Active learning pedagogies and active learning technology are revitalizing STEM education and their use has led to an increase in student performance and satisfaction with the learning environment in postsecondary settings. An obstacle to increasing access to ALCs is the cost of constructing such learning environments. To address this challenge, a means to retrofit an existing computer laboratory into an ALC by making use of economy hardware and open-source software was devised. Intended Outcomes: In the context of an introductory sequence of programming courses (i.e., CS1 and CS2), students in a PALS-equipped classroom would perform as well as students in a prototypical ALC. Application Design: A quasi-experimental study was employed to compare the overall student performance across learning environments. Student performance was measured by the final exam score and overall course score. Throughout the study, the PALS-equipped classroom was paired five different times in head-to-head comparisons with either a prototypical ALC or a traditional classroom. Findings: The focus of the study was the potential effects of classroom type on students' final exam score and the overall course score. A statistically significant effect was found for only one measure, which was that students in the PALS classroom in CS1 scored higher on their overall course score even when accounting for demographic differences and the pretest measure. There were no other significant effects for classroom type, either on the final exam score for either course or the overall course score in CS2.

Highlights

  • A CTIVE learning and active learning classrooms (ALCs) have reinvigorated STEM education at the post-secondary level, increasing student performance and Manuscript received January 12, 2020; revised May 27, 2020 and June 29, 2020; accepted July 11, 2020

  • A statistically significant effect was found for only one measure, which was that students in the Practical active learning stations (PALSs) classroom in CS1 scored higher on their overall course score even when accounting for demographic differences and the pretest measure

  • The sections of CPS 181 were offered at different times in the day due to scheduling limitations. Another notable limitation was that the number of students in the ALC numbered around 45 students while the PALS and traditional classrooms accommodated around 25–30 students

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A CTIVE learning and active learning classrooms (ALCs) have reinvigorated STEM education at the post-secondary level, increasing student performance and Manuscript received January 12, 2020; revised May 27, 2020 and June 29, 2020; accepted July 11, 2020. An enduring challenge with such designs has been the cost, with reports of constructing or retrofitting existing traditional classrooms to prototypical ALCs reaching hundreds of thousands of U.S dollars [3], [7], [8]. These costs may place these proven types of learning environments beyond the reach of many institutions of higher learning. An obstacle to increasing access to ALCs is the cost of constructing such learning environments To address this challenge, a means to retrofit an existing computer laboratory into an ALC by making use of economy hardware and open-source software was devised. Throughout the study, the PALS-equipped classroom was paired five different times in head-to-head comparisons with either a prototypical ALC or a traditional classroom

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call