Abstract

Background. Flow cytometry (FC) algorithms of detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) are well standardized, and approximate to molecular biologic methods. However, besides informative leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotype, which are selected taking into account a tumor phenotype at diagnostics stage, it is necessary to consider specificity of the provided taget therapy and its influence on a cell. Objective: to offer stable combinations of antigens to identify B-cell precursors in patients on therapy of blinatumomab. Materials and methods. Clinical observation of patient G. 4 years old with B-cell precursors acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (pre-pre-B immunosubtype), whom after 3 bloks of reinduction therapy, taking into account MRD-positive status, blinatumomab was appointed as a monotherapy. Tumor immunophenotype was characterized in details by FC protocol according to EuroFlow in debute and relapse of the disease. MRD monitoring was provided by 8-color FC taking into account personalized leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotypes. Results. In patient with B-cell precursors ALL received blinatumomab, the strategy of MRD monitoring was changed. Due to the lack of CD19 expression, identification of B-cell precursors was based on expression of cyCD22 in combination with nuclear TdT and CD10. Conclusion. In case of blinatumomab’s appointment during B-cell precursors ALL therapy, it is necessary to change the strategy of B-cell precursors identification, due to the lack of CD19 expression. Detection of B-cell precursors should be provided by assessment of other pan-B lineage antigens. First of all, it is cyCD22 or cyCD79a in combination with nuclear TdT and CD10, within the limits of nucleated cells of the sample.

Highlights

  • Flow cytometry (FC) algorithms of detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) are well standardized, and approximate to molecular biologic methods

  • Besides informative leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotype, which are selected taking into account a tumor phenotype at diagnostics stage, it is necessary to consider specificity of the provided taget therapy and its influence on a cell

  • Clinical observation of patient G. 4 years old with B-cell precursors acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), whom after 3 bloks of reinduction therapy, taking into account MRD-positive status, blinatumomab was appointed as a monotherapy

Read more

Summary

Оригинальные статьи

Однако помимо информативных лейкозассоциированных иммунофенотипов, отобранных с учетом фенотипа опухоли на этапе диагностики, необходимо принимать во внимание специфичность проводимой таргетной терапии и ее воздействие на клетку. Цель работы – отобрать стабильные комбинации антигенов для выявления В-линейных предшественников у больных на терапии блинатумомабом (анти-CD19). Больному Г., 4 лет, с ранним рецидивом острого лимфобластного лейкоза (ОЛЛ) (пре-пре-В иммуноподварианта) после 3 курсов противорецидивного лечения с учетом сохранения МОБ-положительного статуса был назначен блинатумомаб в режиме монотерапии. Мониторинг МОБ в рецидиве проводили методом 8‐цветной ПЦ с учетом индивидуально отобранных лейкозассоциированных иммунофенотипов. У больного, получающего лечение блинатумомабом, в курсе терапии В-линейного ОЛЛ была изменена стратегия мониторинга МОБ. С учетом отсутствия экспрессии CD19 основой идентификации В-линейных предшественников стали cyCD22 в сочетании с ядерной TdT и CD10. В случае назначения блинатумомаба в курсе терапии В-линейного ОЛЛ выявление В-линейных предшественников должно основываться на оценке экспрессии других пан-В-клеточных антигенов. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia

Background
РОССИЙСКИЙ БИОТЕРАПЕВТИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ Russian journal of biotherapy
Проба ALOT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call