PP30 Do Conditional Regulatory Pathways Affect Health Technology Assessment Recommendations?

Abstract

IntroductionIn an effort to expedite the approval of drugs treating serious illnesses or addressing unmet medical need, conditional approvals have been used by the European Medicines Agency. In this study, the effects of conditional approvals were investigated in terms of health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations and timing in Europe.MethodsFirst HTA recommendations of new active substances (NASs) issued between 2015 and 2017 were collected from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (England), Haute Autorité de Santé (France), Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Germany), Scottish Medicine Consortium (Scotland) and Tandvårds-Läkemedelförmånsverket (Sweden). The HTA recommendations were then classified into the following categories: positive, positive with restrictions, negative and multiple and if the regulatory approval pathway had been standard or conditional.ResultsOf this cohort of NASs that received an HTA recommendation, eight of 56 in England, 12 of 83 in France, 11 of 77 in Germany, nine of 58 in Scotland and four of 49 in Sweden were approved via a conditional review. Generally, except in England, there were a higher proportion of positive first recommendations for conditional approvals when compared to standard approvals, with Germany showing the largest proportional difference (43 percent) between the two pathways and also a faster time to recommendation. This may relate to the proportion of conditional assessments that were orphan medicines. With the exception of Germany, the time taken from regulatory approval to first HTA recommendation for products with conditional approvals is higher than those for standard approvals, with the largest difference seen in Sweden (241 days longer).ConclusionsConditionally approved NASs showed a variable HTA outcome; although there was generally a higher proportion of positive recommendations thus enabling more likely access in conditional approvals, the timing from regulatory approval to HTA recommendation was longer compared with standard approvals. This warrants a better understanding of the factors and uncertainties underlying these recommendations, supporting timely access of NASs with conditional approval.