Abstract

Rationale: Our enteral feeding audit (2011) highlighted variation in dietetic management of patients at risk of refeeding syndrome (RS). We aimed to investigate this further and improve uniformity of practice. Methods: A questionnaire, based on a similar UK study [1] was completed (2012) by all dietitians (n = 17), including case scenarios to elicit RS risk and recommendations for caloric, micronutrient and electrolyte provision. Results were presented to the department. A medical audit highlighted poor awareness of RS and an interdisciplinary working group was formed. A hospital RS policy was developed and dietetic practice was re-audited in 2013 (n = 15). Results: Substantial variation was seen in perceived risk of RS with 53% of respondents correctly identifying high RS risk as per NICE2. Extreme and moderate risk were identified in 71% and 64% of respondents respectively. Identification of RS risk improved at all levels on re-audit, with 87%, 80% and 67% of dietitians identifying high, extreme and moderate risk respectively. Recommendations for initial caloric provision improved; 80% correctly prescribing 10 kcal /kg in high risk and 50% giving 5 kcal /kg in extreme risk, compared to 47% and 35% respectively on initial audit. Some overfeeding at extreme risk was still evident on re-audit, while underfeeding in high risk ceased. Recommendations for appropriate route and dose of thiamine and multivitamin supplementation markedly improved (80% vs 24%). Provision of full electrolyte requirements on feed initiation, as per NICE2 was deemed unsafe. Conclusion: Dietetic identification of RS risk, caloric provision and micronutrient recommendations improved at all levels of risk, with some scope for increased uniformity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call