Abstract
Objective: Fixed drug combinations are increasingly used in antihypertensive therapy, so it is necessary to find the best combinations to achieve the best therapeutic effects not only in the control of arterial blood pressure (BP), but in other relevant aspects such as arterial stiffness (AS) of these patients (P). To evaluate the efficacy in reducing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and arterial stiffness between two fixed combinations of antihypertensive drugs: olmesartan plus amlodipine (olm + aml) and valsartan plus amlodipine (val + aml) in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Design and method: We studied 126 P (53 ± 9 years) with mild-moderate hypertension with LVH who received two fixed combinations of antihypertensive drugs to maintain BP below 140/90 Hgmm in the office: olm + aml group: 66 P and val + aml group: 60 P to whom an echocardiographic study to detect LVH was performed by measuring the walls of the left ventricle and central systolic and diastolic pressures (CSBP, CDBP) were measured, the augmentation index (AI) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) at baseline and 32 weeks of treatment. Results: Data from both groups were compared and are shown in the following table:Conclusions: Our data suggest that the combination of OLM + AML is significantly higher than VAL + AML in reducing LVH and in reducing arterial stiffness indices indicating that not only provide a benefit in the control of blood pressure but also in the significant reduction in cardiovascular risk and mortality, being the HVI an independent marker of mortality in hypertensive patients, which should influence the selection of a fixed combination antihypertensive comprehensive control of our patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.