Abstract

Objective: Accurate blood pressure measurements are fundamental in order to achieve correct diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. We performed a validation of the A&D UA767PlusBT and the Omron 705IT, using different oscillometric waveform simulators. Design and method: Firstly, we tested 30 monitors of the A&D UA767PlusBT using 2 different waveform simulators (Metron QA-1280 and BioTek BP Pump2). Secondly, we tested 5 previously used blood pressure monitors from A&D UA767PlusBT and Omron 705IT using a Fluke BP Pump 2L simulator, 5 monitors per manufacturer, 10 monitors in total. Three measurements were obtained per monitor, for each of the eight simulated and preset patient conditions. Thirdly, we tested new and unused blood pressure monitors from A&D UA767PlusBT and the Omron 705IT using a Fluke BP Pump 2L simulator; ten monitors per model, twenty monitors in total. Six measurements were obtained per monitor, for each of the eight simulated patient conditions. Results: Using the Metron simulator, A&D UA767PlusBT showed a significant deviation for systolic BP (systolic/diastolic, -7.8 ± 2.9/1.5 ± 1.6 mmHg). Using the Biotek simulator, the same systolic deviation was shown (systolic/diastolic, -9.1 ± 2.3/2.7 ± 3.2 mmHg). Both systolic deviations exceed the specified measurement accuracy of ± 3 mmHg. Using the Fluke simulator, previously used A&D UA767PlusBT monitors showed similar deviations (systolic/diastolic, -10/2 mmHg, range -14;-4/-7;7, p < 0.001/p < 0.001), whereas used Omron 705IT did not show deviations exceeding the specified level (systolic/diastolic, -1/2, range -5;5/-5;5 mmHg, p = 0.6/p < 0.001). Using the Fluke simulator, new and unused A&D UA767PlusBT monitors showed significant deviations exceeding the specified accuracy (systolic/diastolic, -4/2 mmHg, range -14;2/-6;8, p < 0.001/p < 0.001), whereas new and unused Omron 705IT monitors did not show deviations exceeding the specified level (systolic/diastolic 0/2.4 mmHg, range -5;10/-1;6, p < 0.001/p < 0.001). Conclusions: The A&D UA767PlusBT monitors measured systematically too low systolic BP but exhibited good precision. Omron 705IT monitors showed both high accuracy and good precision for both diastolic and systolic values. The differences between monitors from these two manufacturers can most likely be attributed to differences in the algorithms used to estimate BP. The consequence for patients with hypertension would be an increased cardiovascular risk, if systolic BP is estimated to be falsely too low.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.