Abstract

This paper introduces a method to efficiently monitor the status of a piston engine during flight. ECUs (Electronic Control Units) make it possible to fly safely without emergencies or urgencies with random electronic failures of components and connections. The same can be easily done on older engines by adding a reliable digital monitoring system and an automated calibration of the carburetors. In fact, their reliability is several order of magnitude inferior to modern turboshafts. In modern engines with FADEC (Full Authority Digital Electronic Control) as the “on” button is pressed the sensors and actuators are checked. The CPUs will then run start-up during the cranking phase (engine running without ignition). If everything is all right, then the engine starts and the post start checks are also performed. During flight, the ECU checks CPUs, sensors and actuators. Therefore, the electronic system can be monitored with high reliability without much effort. The sensors may crosscheck the engine situation and may output very reliable early diagnosis of incoming failures. Statistical data on spare parts are invaluable for monitoring application, signaling weak or not-lasting components and failure modes. This is another advantage of automotive piston engines conversions to aircraft use.

Highlights

  • Most aircraft-piston-engines were designed more than 30 years ago

  • This paper introduces a method to efficiently monitor the status of a piston engine during flight

  • The same can be done on modern aircraft engines that have the FADEC (Full Authority Electronic Control)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most aircraft-piston-engines were designed more than 30 years ago. Their reliability have been always inferior to general aviation turbines. Even modern updated automotive propulsion unit have a better reliability than “certified” aircraft piston engines. It is compulsory to install digital monitoring system for the powerplant of older aircrafts and to replace these engines with modern, automotive-derived units in new aerial vehicles. This paper introduces a possible monitoring technique for aircraft piston engines. This technique differs from diagnostic automotive software (OBD—On Board Diagnosis) running on car ECUs (Electronic Control Units) for reasons that will be briefly introduced in the following paragraphs. This paper is composed by an introduction about aircraft piston engine reliability, a summary of most common aircraft piston engine failures, a brief description of engine monitoring systems, and the proposal for a the new digital monitoring software

Aircraft Piston Engine Reliability
Wrong Concepts on Aircraft Piston Engines
Engine Failure Modes
Materials and Methods
Monitoring Systems
Diagnostic System
10. Diagnostic
10. Diagnostic System
11. Diagnostic
11. Diagnostic System
12. Diagnostic System
13. Diagnostic System
15. Conclusions
Findings
14. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call