Abstract

Lacking awareness of appropriate type of power to apply might cause top management to implement equitable practices that fail to produce job satisfaction among subordinates. This study attempts to assess the relationship between organisational justice, power distance and job satisfaction among employees of Selangor Office of State secretary, Malaysia. It employed a survey method to gather data from the employees. The SmartPLS is used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the survey data and test the research hypotheses. The results of SmartPLS path model analysis revealed two important findings: First, the interaction between distributive justice and low power distance was significantly correlated with job satisfaction. Second, the interaction between procedural justice and high-power distance was significantly correlated with job satisfaction. This outcome confirms that the relationship between distributive justice and job satisfaction is moderated by low power distance, while the relationship between procedural justice and job satisfaction is moderated by high power distance. Further, significant recommendations from this study can help practitioners to understand diverse perspectives of power distance and draw up cross-cultural management plans to enable their human resource to contribute towards the attainment of the organisation’s vision and missions.

Highlights

  • Organisational justice has captured the attention of researchers in organisational life literature (Jamaliah et al, 2017; Jehanzeb & Mohanty, 2020)

  • The results of testing the research hypothesis show that interaction between distributive justice (DJUST) and Low power distance (LOPD) is significantly correlated with job satisfaction (JSAT) (B=0.150; t=1.816); supporting H3

  • This result confirms that effect of DJUST on JSAT is moderated by LOPD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organisational justice has captured the attention of researchers in organisational life literature (Jamaliah et al, 2017; Jehanzeb & Mohanty, 2020). Western social scientists have been giving great attention to distributive justice that is associated with Adams’ Equity Theory According to this theory, employees perceive justice is done when the outcomes (e.g., rewards) that they receive are distributed according to their inputs (e.g., effort) (Chandrasai et al, 2020; Folger & Konovsky, 1989; Lambert et al, 2007). Employees perceive justice is done when the outcomes (e.g., rewards) that they receive are distributed according to their inputs (e.g., effort) (Chandrasai et al, 2020; Folger & Konovsky, 1989; Lambert et al, 2007) This type of justice has been studied in a number of settings, such as sales and retailing (Schwepker, 2016), resistance to organisational change (Van Der Voet, 2019), work related attitude in organisations (Chandrasai et al, 2020; Mahboob & Khan, 2017) and ethical and legal compliance in government agencies (Kiswanto et al, 2020)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call