Abstract

Background: Epigenome-wide association scans (EWAS) are under way for many complex human traits, but EWAS power has not been fully assessed. We investigate power of EWAS to detect differential methylation using case-control and disease-discordant monozygotic (MZ) twin designs with genome-wide DNA methylation arrays.Methods and Results: We performed simulations to estimate power under the case-control and discordant MZ twin EWAS study designs, under a range of epigenetic risk effect sizes and conditions. For example, to detect a 10% mean methylation difference between affected and unaffected subjects at a genome-wide significance threshold of P = 1 × 10−6, 98 MZ twin pairs were required to reach 80% EWAS power, and 112 cases and 112 controls pairs were needed in the case-control design. We also estimated the minimum sample size required to reach 80% EWAS power under both study designs. Our analyses highlighted several factors that significantly influenced EWAS power, including sample size, epigenetic risk effect size, the variance of DNA methylation at the locus of interest and the correlation in DNA methylation patterns within the twin sample.Conclusions: We provide power estimates for array-based DNA methylation EWAS under case-control and disease-discordant MZ twin designs, and explore multiple factors that impact on EWAS power. Our results can help guide EWAS experimental design and interpretation for future epigenetic studies.

Highlights

  • Recent advances in epigenetic technologies have enabled high-throughput epigenome-wide association scans (EWAS)

  • Power simulations were performed under the case-control Epigenome-wide association scans (EWAS) design, by sampling effect sizes based on the mean difference in DNA methylation between cases and controls

  • At a genome-wide significance (P 1⁄4 1 Â 10À6) the same sample size gives over 80% power to detect a much larger effect size of 11% mean difference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent advances in epigenetic technologies have enabled high-throughput epigenome-wide association scans (EWAS). Similar to genome-wide association scans (GWAS), in EWAS power depends on several key factors including study design and sample size, effect size and correction for multiple testing. At least two additional factors that are specific to epigenetic data can influence power, and these are the longitudinal stability of the epigenetic marks and their variance within a biological sample, because epigenetic signals in a biological sample from one individual represent frequency measures from a population of cells. Most of these factors remain unknown, results from recent EWAS can provide some insights. Our results can help guide EWAS experimental design and interpretation for future epigenetic studies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.