Power and Evolutionary Fitness of Teleosts

Abstract

The use of optimization arguments in evolutionary biology has been criticized because the methodology requires an assumption about what is being maximized by natural selection. As optimality arguments are often a priori and always speculative, the critics point out that there is no theoretical basis for any maximization principles in biology. They contend that only empirical work can establish if there are some properties of species that are generally maximized by natural selection. I accept this standard for evaluation, and argue that the concept of surplus power, which provides a physiological basis for optimal foraging and life history theory, is related to fitness. Evidence in the form of specific morphological and behavioral traits in teleost fishes is presented to demonstrate that natural selection has increased surplus power. Life history theory is concerned with how power is allocated by organisms to various vital functions; therefore, the specific problem of stock and recruitment in fisheries can be treated as a special application of life history theory. Some implications about the dynamics and possible survival value of different reproductive strategies exhibited by teleosts are discussed.Key words: surplus power, evolutionary biology, optimal foraging, life history theory, fitness