Abstract

Low incidence of Pott's Puffy tumor (PPT) has caused studying risk factors and recurrences of the disease to be difficult. We used the comparatively increased incidence at our institution to evaluate potential risk factors for the disease process itself and prognostic factors for recurrence of the disease. Single institutional retrospective chart review identified 31 patients from 2010 to 2022 with PPT compared with a control group of 20 patients with either chronic rhinosinusitis or recurrent sinusitis. Patient mean age of PPT was 42 (range of 5 to 90) with the majority of the patient population as male (74%) and Caucasian (68%) in the setting of rural West Texas. Patient mean age of the control group was 50.7 (range of 30-78) with majority of patient population as male (55%) and Caucasian (70%). Interventions studied were functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), FESS with trephination, and cranialization with or without FESS to compare prognostic factors for recurrence rates of PPT. These patients' prognostic risk factors for recurrence and risk factors to develop PPT were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) χ 2 statistical analysis with Fischer exact testing. Mean age was 42 years (range of 5-90) with the majority of the PPT patient population as male (74%) and Caucasian (68%) with an overall incidence of about 1 in 300,000. Pott's Puffy tumor patients were significantly favored in the younger and male population compared with the control patients. Risk factors of no prior allergy diagnosis, previous trauma, medication allergy to penicillin class or cephalosporin class, and lower body mass index were significant in the PPT population compared with the control group. Significant prognostic factors for recurrence of PPT were prior history of sinus surgery and operative treatment choice. Fifty percent (3/6) of patients with prior sinus surgery had recurrence of PPT. Of our 4 treatment options (FESS, FESS with trephination, FESS with cranialization, or cranialization alone), ;FESS had a recurrence of PPT of 0% (0/13), FESS with trephination had a recurrence of PPT of 50% (3/6), FESS with cranialization had a recurrence of PPT of 11% (1/9), and cranizalization alone had a recurrence of PPT of 0% (0/3). Of note, postop chronic rhinosinusitis was seen in 46% (6/13) of FESS alone, 17% (1/6) with FESS with trephination, 0% (0/9) with FESS with cranialization, and 33% (1/3) with just cranialization alone. Pott's Puffy tumor patients were younger and predominately male when compared to the control patients. No prior allergy diagnosis, previous trauma history, medication allergy to penicillin class or cephalosporin class, and lower body mass index are risk factors for PPT. There are 2 prognostic factors that predict recurrence of PPT: first operative treatment choice and prior sinus surgery. History of prior sinus surgery tends to increase the recurrence of PPT. The first operative treatment plan is the best shot at definitively treating PPT. Correct management surgically can prevent recurrence of PPT as well as long-term recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis. With early diagnosis and mild disease, FESS is sufficient to prevent recurrence of PPT but chronic sinusitis may continue to occur if frontal sinus outflow track is not well opened. If considering trephination, a definitive cranialization may be more suited for more advanced disease since our study showed 50% of recurrence of PPT with trephination and FESS along with 17% chronic sinusitis long term. More advanced diseases with higher WBCs and intracranial extension do better with more aggressive surgical management with a cranialization with or without FESS which shows to reduce rates of PPT recurrence significantly.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.