Abstract

A new approach to investigate potential screening at the interface of ionic liquids (ILs) and charged electrodes in a two‐electrode electrochemical cell by in situ X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been introduced. Using identical electrodes, we deduce the potential screening at the working and the counter electrodes as a function of applied voltage from the potential change of the bulk IL, as derived from corresponding core level binding energy shifts for different IL/electrode combinations. For imidazolium‐based ILs and Pt electrodes, we find a significantly larger potential screening at the anode than at the cathode, which we attribute to strong attractive interactions between the imidazolium cation and Pt. In the absence of specific ion/electrode interactions, asymmetric potential screening only occurs for ILs with different cation and anion sizes as demonstrated for an imidazolium chloride IL and Au electrodes, which we assign to the different thicknesses of the electrical double layers. Our results imply that potential screening in ILs is mainly established by a single layer of counterions at the electrode.

Highlights

  • A new approach to investigate potential screening at the interface of ionic liquids (ILs) and charged electrodes in a twoelectrode electrochemical cell by in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been introduced

  • For imidazolium-based ILs and Pt electrodes, we find a significantly larger potential screening at the anode than at the cathode, which we attribute to strong attractive interactions between the imidazolium cation and Pt

  • The interfacial properties have been addressed by electrochemical impedance spectrometry (EIS),[2] cyclic voltammetry (CV),[3] sum-frequency generation (SFG),[4] X-ray reflectivity,[5] scanning tunneling microscopy,[6]

Read more

Summary

Photoelectron Spectroscopy

We attribute this asymmetric potential screening to the asymmetric structure/interaction of the EDL at the anode and cathode To further elucidate this behavior, we studied the interfaces of imidazolium-based ILs and [C4C1Pyrr][Tf2N] with Pt and Au electrodes (see Table S1 in the SI). To study the effect of different ILs and electrodes on our reference point, we measured the F 1s XPS peak position at 0 V using both Pt and Au electrodes as well as different ILs. Notably, in all cases we found the same binding energy of 688.79 ( 0.08) eV, which indicates very similar charging and potential screening at www.chemistryopen.org zero applied voltage (see Table S2 in the SI). Our findings offer an excellent starting point for studying various IL/metal interfaces under ultraclean conditions

Experimental Section
Conflict of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call