Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine the (1) potential cost difference (opportunity cost [OC]) to Medicare-eligible beneficiaries enrolled in the lowest-cost standalone prescription drug plan (PDP) in 2007 between the cost of such plan in 2008 and the lowest-cost plan in 2008 and the (2) percentage of PDPs with the lowest estimated annual cost (EAC) in both 2007 and 2008. DesignDescriptive exploratory study. SettingUnited States during 2007 and 2008. Patients50 patients were randomly selected from a database of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries. InterventionPharmacy claims records for each study patient were obtained during the period January 1 to June 30, 2007. Patient medication profiles were generated using these data and entered into the Medicare Plan Finder Tool (www.medicare.gov) to obtain the EAC of each PDP from 2007 and 2008 in all 34 Medicare Part D regions. Main outcome measuresThe 2008 EAC of the lowest-cost PDP from 2007 was recorded. OC was determined by subtracting the 2008 EAC of the lowest-cost PDP in 2008 from the 2008 EAC of the lowest-cost PDP in 2007 for each patient in each region. The percentage of PDPs that had the lowest EAC in both 2007 and 2008 was recorded. ResultsThe 2008 EACs of the lowest-cost PDPs from 2007 were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the lowest-cost PDPs of 2008 within all 34 Medicare regions. The mean OC ranged from $276 to $562 nationally. Only 12% of plans were the lowest-cost PDP in both 2007 and 2008. ConclusionMedicare beneficiaries should reevaluate PDP offerings annually during the open enrollment period; failure to do so may increase avoidable out-of-pocket costs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.