Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the potential of Mislejk on the authority to creditors to abolish mortgage rights. The research method in writing this article is normative juridical. Secondary legal sources are used as the main sources in this study which are then processed to identify the main issues in positioning legal rules or norms as the basis for the author's assessment, taking into account some primary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that the provisions of Article 22 paragraph (6) of the Mortgage Law as previously described do not have legal certainty. Thus, legal remedies that can be taken by the Customer in resolving Creditors who are reluctant to write off are as follows: Internal Settlement through the Banking Law mechanism, Settlement through Alternative Dispute Resolution, and Settlement through Courts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
