Abstract

Methods that link different models for investigating the retrieval of canopy biophysical/structural variables have been substantially adopted in the remote sensing community. To retrieve global biophysical parameters from multiangle data, the kernel-driven bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) model has been widely applied to satellite multiangle observations to model (interpolate/extrapolate) the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) in an arbitrary direction of viewing and solar geometries. Such modeled BRFs, as an essential information source, are then input into an inversion procedure that is devised through a large number of simulation analyses from some widely used physical models that can generalize such an inversion relationship between the BRFs (or their simple algebraic composite) and the biophysical/structural parameter. Therefore, evaluation of such a link between physical models and kernel-driven models contributes to the development of such inversion procedures to accurately retrieve vegetation properties, particularly based on the operational global BRDF parameters derived from satellite multiangle observations (e.g., MODIS). In this study, the main objective is to investigate the potential for linking a popular physical model (PROSAIL) with the widely used kernel-driven Ross-Li models. To do this, the BRFs and albedo are generated by the physical PROSAIL in a forward model, and then the simulated BRFs are input into the kernel-driven BRDF model for retrieval of the BRFs and albedo in the same viewing and solar geometries. To further strengthen such an investigation, a variety of field-measured multiangle reflectances have also been used to investigate the potential for linking these two models. For simulated BRFs generated by the PROSAIL model at 659 and 865 nm, the two models are generally comparable to each other, and the resultant root mean square errors (RMSEs) are 0.0092 and 0.0355, respectively, although some discrepancy in the simulated BRFs can be found at large average leaf angle (ALA) values. Unsurprisingly, albedos generated by the method are quite consistent, and 99.98% and 97.99% of the simulated white sky albedo (WSA) has a divergence less than 0.02. For the field measurements, the kernel-driven model presents somewhat better model-observation congruence than the PROSAIL model. The results show that these models have an overall good consistency for both field-measured and model-simulated BRFs. Therefore, there is potential for linking these two models for looking into the retrieval of canopy biophysical/structural variables through a simulation method, particularly from the current archive of the global routine MODIS BRDF parameters that were produced by the kernel-driven BRDF model; however, erectophile vegetation must be further examined.

Highlights

  • Linking different models for various applications in remote sensing is an important method

  • The PROSPECT model has been linked with the A two-layer Canopy Reflectance Model (ACRM) [9], the New Advanced Discrete (NADI) model [10] and the 3-D Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model (URL: http://teledetection.ipgp.jussieu.fr/prosail/) for various applications

  • The hotspot-fits are somewhat better for the RTCLSR model than for the RTCLTR model, which demonstrates that the hotspot-corrected RossThick kernel (i.e., KRTC) plays a better role in conjunction with the Li Sparse-Reciprocal (LSR) kernel than the Li Transit-Reciprocal (LTR) kernel [30,36] in this case

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Linking different models for various applications in remote sensing is an important method. By linking the optical Properties Spectra (PROSPECT) broadleaf model and the homogeneous Scattering by Arbitrarily Inclined Leaves (SAIL) canopy reflectance (CR) model, the PROPECT+SAIL (named PROSAIL) model has been widely used to simulate canopy spectral and directional reflectance and to retrieve biophysical parameters [1,2,3]. The practicability of this model has been substantially validated using large numbers of field measurements. The other conifer leaf model named the LIBERTY model was linked with the 4-Scale CR model to generate the so-called 5-Scale model [11,12,13] for the enhancement of simulation ability of these models

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call