Abstract

Abstract. Aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs) have been widely recognized as a factor affecting precipitation. However, they have not been considered in the operational National Centers for Environmental Predictions Global Forecast System model. We evaluated the potential impact of neglecting ACI on the operational rainfall forecast using ground-based and satellite observations and model reanalysis. The Climate Prediction Center unified gauge-based precipitation analysis and the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 aerosol reanalysis were used to evaluate the forecast in three countries for the year 2015. The overestimation of light rain (47.84 %) and underestimation of heavier rain (31.83, 52.94, and 65.74 % for moderate rain, heavy rain, and very heavy rain, respectively) from the model are qualitatively consistent with the potential errors arising from not accounting for ACI, although other factors cannot be totally ruled out. The standard deviation of the forecast bias was significantly correlated with aerosol optical depth in Australia, the US, and China. To gain further insight, we chose the province of Fujian in China to pursue a more insightful investigation using a suite of variables from gauge-based observations of precipitation, visibility, water vapor, convective available potential energy (CAPE), and satellite datasets. Similar forecast biases were found: over-forecasted light rain and under-forecasted heavy rain. Long-term analyses revealed an increasing trend in heavy rain in summer and a decreasing trend in light rain in other seasons, accompanied by a decreasing trend in visibility, no trend in water vapor, and a slight increasing trend in summertime CAPE. More aerosols decreased cloud effective radii for cases where the liquid water path was greater than 100 g m−2. All findings are consistent with the effects of ACI, i.e., where aerosols inhibit the development of shallow liquid clouds and invigorate warm-base mixed-phase clouds (especially in summertime), which in turn affects precipitation. While we cannot establish rigorous causal relations based on the analyses presented in this study, the significant rainfall forecast bias seen in operational weather forecast model simulations warrants consideration in future model improvements.

Highlights

  • Aerosols affect precipitation by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nuclei (IN), which can influence cloud microphysics (Twomey et al, 1984) and cloud lifetime (Albrecht, 1989)

  • MERRA-2 aerosol optical depth (AOD) is at a resolution of 0.625◦ × 0.5◦ and is interpolated to the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) and Global Forecast System (GFS) precipitation resolution using a linear interpolation method

  • There are many reasons for the difference between modeled and observed precipitation, these results suggest that to some extent, the neglect of aerosol effects may contribute to the model rainfall forecast bias

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aerosols affect precipitation by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nuclei (IN), which can influence cloud microphysics (Twomey et al, 1984) and cloud lifetime (Albrecht, 1989). M. Jiang et al.: Potential influences of neglecting aerosol effects namic conditions of the atmosphere. The two types of effects are broadly referred to as aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs) and aerosol–radiation interactions (ARIs) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013). Both can influence precipitation (Rosenfeld et al, 2008) and many other meteorological variables to the extent that they may account for the considerable changes in climate experienced in Asia over the past half century (Li et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call