Abstract

Abstract. In July 2013, the city of St. Gallen conducted a deep geothermal project that aimed to exploit energy for district heating and generating power. A few days after an injection test and two acid stimulations that caused only minor seismicity, a gas kick forced the operators to inject drilling mud to combat the kick. Subsequently, multiple earthquakes were induced on a fault several hundred meters away from the well, including a ML 3.5 event that was felt throughout the nearby population centers. Given the occurrence of a gas kick and a felt seismic sequence with low total injected fluid volumes (∼1200 m3), the St. Gallen deep geothermal project represents a particularly interesting case study of induced seismicity. Here, we first present a conceptual model based on seismic, borehole, and seismological data suggesting a hydraulic connection between the well and the fault. The overpressurized gas, which is assumed to be initially sealed by the fault, may have been released due to the stimulations before entering the well via the hydraulic connection. We test this hypothesis with a numerical model calibrated against the borehole pressure of the injection test. We successfully reproduce the gas kick and spatiotemporal characteristics of the main seismicity sequence following the well control operation. The results indicate that the gas may have destabilized the fault during and after the injection operations and could have enhanced the resulting seismicity. This study may have implications for future deep hydrothermal projects conducted in similar geological conditions with potentially overpressurized in-place gas.

Highlights

  • Industrial injection and extraction projects causing anthropogenic earthquakes have increased during recent years and have been conducted closer to densely populated areas (Foulger et al, 2018)

  • The seismic module of TOUGH2-seed is switched off during the simulation of the injection test and the gas kick to simplify the calibration of the model; we use the full model during the simulation of the main seismic sequence

  • The results showed that the induced events of the injection test all lay in regions of positive Coulomb stress change, the magnitude of the stress changes was on the order of 10−3 MPa or lower, which is about 3 orders of magnitude smaller than in the case of a hydraulic connection (Fig. 7)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Industrial injection and extraction projects causing anthropogenic earthquakes have increased during recent years and have been conducted closer to densely populated areas (Foulger et al, 2018). Several geothermal projects globally have induced seismicity (e.g., Baisch et al, 2015; Evans et al, 2012; Grigoli et al, 2018; Jeanne et al, 2015); recently, a Mw 5.5 earthquake struck the city of Pohang (South Korea) (Ellsworth et al, 2019; Grigoli et al, 2018), the largest earthquake recorded at an EGS site to date (Kim et al, 2018) This earthquake has challenged recently proposed models that relate the maximum expected seismic magnitude to the total injected fluid volume (Galis et al, 2017; McGarr, 2014). In comparison to the local stress field, SH intersects the fault with an angle of about 50◦

Conceptual model
Model setup and calibration
TOUGH2-seed
Numerical model setup
Model calibration
Injection test
Gas kick
Well control injection and associated seismicity
Effect of the gas on the induced seismicity
Implications for future deep hydrothermal projects
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call