Abstract

Background and aimsSoil inoculation is a powerful tool for the restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. However, the origin of the donor material may differentially influence early- and late-successional plant species. Donor soil from late-succession stages may benefit target plant species due to a higher abundance of soil-borne mutualists. Arable soils, on the other hand, may suppress ruderals as they support more root herbivores that preferentially attack ruderal plant species, while mid-succession soils may be intermediate in their effects on ruderals and target species performance. We hypothesized that a mixture of arable and late-succession inocula may outperform pure late-successional inocula for restoration, by promoting late-successional target plants, while simultaneously reducing ruderal species’ performance.MethodsWe conducted a glasshouse experiment and tested the growth of ruderal and target plant species on pure and mixed inocula. The inocula were derived from arable fields, mid-succession grasslands and late-succession heathlands and we created a replacement series testing different pairwise mixitures for each of these inocula types (ratios: 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, 0:100 of inoculum A and B respectively).ResultsIn general, we found that a higher proportion of heathland material led to a higher aboveground biomass of target plant species, while responses of ruderal species were variable. We found synergistic effects when specific inocula were mixed. In particular, a 50:50 mixture of heathland and arable soil in the inoculum led to a significant reduction in ruderal species biomass relative to the two respective pure inocula. The overall response was driven by Myosotis arvensis, since the other two ruderal species were not significantly affected.ConclusionsMixing inocula from different successional stages can lead to synergistic effects on restoration, but this highly depends on the specific combination of inocula, the mixing ratio and plant species. This suggest that specific inocula may need to be developed in order to rapidly restore different plant communities.

Highlights

  • Many natural ecosystems need to be restored in order to reach international conservation targets (Vitousek et al 1997; Hobbs and Harris 2001)

  • Mixing inocula from different successional stages can lead to synergistic effects on restoration, but this highly depends on the specific combination of inocula, the mixing ratio and plant species

  • This suggest that specific inocula may need to be developed in order to rapidly restore different plant communities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many natural ecosystems need to be restored in order to reach international conservation targets (Vitousek et al 1997; Hobbs and Harris 2001). Using a large-scale field experiment in an area intended for nature restoration on former arable land, we recently showed that application of whole soil inocula sourced from a target grassland or heathland can steer the aboveand belowground community composition in the ecosystem under restoration in the direction of its respective donor (Wubs et al 2016). The composition, and abundance of the soil community changes considerably during natural succession (Kardol et al 2005; Van der Wal et al 2006; Bauer et al 2015; Castle et al 2016; Frouz et al 2016). During secondary succession on former arable land the abundance of mycorrhiza increases (Janos 1980; Johnson et al 1991; Barni and Siniscalco 2000) and their composition changes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call